Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:06

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Utah woman loses 100 pounds in one year: Here's how - KSL.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Inside J.J. Spaun's Arizona Home as He Claims Surprising U.S. Open Win - Realtor.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
ESA supports Moon mission carrying first European rover - European Space Agency
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What are some common historical misconceptions?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Paul vs. Chavez Jr. Results: Live updates of the undercard and main event - MMA Fighting
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Horoscope for Wednesday, June 11, 2025 - Chicago Sun-Times
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Superbugs thrive as access to antibiotics fails in India - BBC